C. S. Lewis's Dangerous Idea: In Defense of the Argument from Reason Reppert Victor
Who ought to hold claim to the more dangerous idea--Charles Darwin or C. S. Lewis? Daniel Dennett argued for Darwin in Darwin's Dangerous Idea (Touchstone Books, 1996). In this book Victor Reppert…
Specifikacia C. S. Lewis's Dangerous Idea: In Defense of the Argument from Reason Reppert Victor
Who ought to hold claim to the more dangerous idea--Charles Darwin or C. S. Lewis? Daniel Dennett argued for Darwin in Darwin's Dangerous Idea (Touchstone Books, 1996). In this book Victor Reppert champions C. S. Lewis. Darwinists attempt to use science to show that our world and its inhabitants can be fully explained as the product of a mindless, purposeless system of physics and chemistry. But Lewis claimed in his argument from reason that if such materialism or naturalism were true then scientific reasoning itself could not be trusted. Victor Reppert believes that Lewis's arguments have been too often dismissed. In C. S. Lewis's Dangerous Idea Reppert offers careful, able development of Lewis's thought and demonstrates that the basic thrust of Lewis's argument from reason can bear up under the weight of the most serious philosophical attacks. Charging dismissive
In Defense of the Indians
In Total Defense Of The Self
Place of Emotion in Argument
In Defense of Sanity
In Defense of Childhood
For the Sake of Argument
In Defense of Housing
In Defense of Prejudice
In Defense of Ska