Rectifying Historical Injustice: Debating the Supersession Thesis Meyer Lukas H.
Calls for redress of historical wrongs regularly make headlines around the world. People dispute the degree to which justice should be concerned with righting past wrongs, with some arguing that…
Specifikacia Rectifying Historical Injustice: Debating the Supersession Thesis Meyer Lukas H.
Calls for redress of historical wrongs regularly make headlines around the world. People dispute the degree to which justice should be concerned with righting past wrongs, with some arguing that justice should be primarily focused on claims arising from present disadvantage. Proponents and sceptics of restitution, compensation, and other forms of historical redress have engaged with the thesis that historical injustice can be superseded, the idea that changing circumstances following historical injustices can alter what justice later requires. The "supersession thesis," developed by legal and political philosopher Jeremy Waldron, has been challenged, both conceptually and in terms of its possible application and implications.This is the first book to critically assess how the supersession thesis might be reconstructed, challenged, or applied to empirical cases, with an eye